Re: Gnome Desktop Only

On Fri, 2002-09-27 at 07:02, Eric Hartwell wrote:
> my point is that to be what we hold dear as "Linux" redhat would have to amke 
> sure they did not limit the functionaility of components. providing defauls 
> is one thing - diabiling the ability for kmail to be the default mail client  
> is another. 

Is redhat disabling the ability to for someone to come back and change
any of the default applications Redhat has chosen.  Lets not give
everyone lurking on the list like the Cnet author a panic attack at the
mean suggesting that Redhat might being doing this.  As far as I can
tell Redhat has not taking any customization options away from users? 
Are you saying that Redhat has taken any ability to customize away? If
not lets not spread ugly rumors...when the truth is bad enough.

-jef

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQA9lLivrWLDmRitRZURAhHhAJ4rZpXxqndglr4/pbt90o3SolRfqACfX0B2
hdIX3ok1szIlKKlPjbbKjhA=
=zABQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----