Re: any news about redhat 'advanced server' versions?

Are you guys going to specify that to keep the FSF happy?  Just curious.

On 2002.09.28 01:03 Gordon Messmer wrote:
> It wouldn't really be appropriate.  Even "Red Hat GNU/Linux" probably
> wouldn't, since that's not the name of the product.  However, Red Hat
> Linux *is* a distribution of GNU/Linux.
> 
> 
> On Fri, 2002-09-27 at 11:12, Chris Parker wrote:
> > How about GNU/Red Hat?
> >
> > On 2002.09.27 23:03 Jay Turner wrote:
> > > On Fri, Sep 27, 2002 at 05:49:57PM +0200, Chris Parker wrote:
> > > > RH8.0 - Redhat 8.0.
> > >
> > > OK, this really doesn't exist.  Please, the name of the company is
> > > "Red Hat"
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Limbo-list mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/limbo-list
>