Re: Mozilla 1.3??
Jeremy Portzer <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.redhat.release.phoebe |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Tue, 2003-03-18 at 11:50, Justin Georgeson wrote: > What is the difference between the gtk2 and xft versions? I usually use > the xft one, but tried the gtk2 for 1.3, and can't perceive any > difference. I have the msttcorefonts package from sourceforge installed, > and have enabled the TrueType stuff for mozilla, and all those fonts are > listed in the gtk2 version. I thought that was why I was using the xft > one. <shrug> Both the version marked xft and the version marked gtk2 include xft support. The gtk2 one should really be marked "xfg+gtk2" or something like that. So that's why you didn't notice anything different about font rendering. It's quite confusing and not documented, but you can determine this by looking through the patches and configure options. --Jeremy -- /=====================================================================\ | Jeremy Portzer [email protected] trilug.org/~jeremy | | GPG Fingerprint: 712D 77C7 AB2D 2130 989F E135 6F9F F7BC CC1A 7B92 | \=====================================================================/
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQA+eMDzb5/3vMwae5IRAqtDAKDnSRzfG544MOby5/1rhxxMJoeTKACgs80u gx23tsUSp+daV5L/vZZgfPw= =dWna -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----