Re: Stealth release announcement?
joe <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.redhat.release.phoebe |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
It seems the changes are fundamental enough to merit a new major version number, if that is indeed the case - It could be that 9.0 is meant to be "2.5-ready" Joe Kent Pirkle wrote: >It's on the main www.redhat.com page too. > >I wonder why 9.0 instead of 8.1? > > > > >>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >>Hash: SHA1 >> >> From the Red Hat Linux 6.2/7.0 End of Life Reminder that I just >>received: >> >> "And, as of 3/31, Red Hat Linux 9 will be available to Red Hat >>Network subscribers as well." >> >> Since this came directly from Red Hat, I just might be inclined to >>believe it. Anyone care to confirm or deny? >> >> >>- -- >>Matthew J. Brodeur RHCE, >>GSEC [email protected] >>http://www.NextTime.com >> >>"As you and I both know, the software may be free, but the beer isn't." >> -- Jon "maddog" Hall >> >> >>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- >>Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (GNU/Linux) >> >>iD8DBQE+f1rTc8/WFSz+GKMRAjsZAJsFDIOGxnyXMHe/x/s2oI2rRiKPdgCfWynN >>ZWY3rGaniU0QAh2ykwOM3wY= >>=YUBW >>-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- >> >> >> >>-- >>Phoebe-list mailing list >>[email protected] >>https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/phoebe-list >> >> > > > > > > > -- Phoebe-list mailing list [email protected] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/phoebe-list