Re: Pre-announcement?

Louis Garcia <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.redhat.release.phoebe
Message-ID <1048541604.2469.0.camel@tiger>
me thinks it's because of the new threading stuff.

--Lou

On Mon, 2003-03-24 at 16:13, The Matt wrote:
> On Mon, 2003-03-24 at 13:45, William Hooper wrote:
> > Rick Johnson said:
> > > Michael St. Laurent wrote:
> > >> I just got an end-of-life notification for an old system.[snip]
> > 
> > If you have a basic subscription to RHN you get an announcement also.
> > 
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > > Red Hat 9.0? What happened to 8.1?
> > 
> > Binary compatibility.  RH always goes to x.0 when they don't preserve
> > binary compatibility.  Now you know why some people (like me) think it was
> > silly to be calling it RH 8.1 beta in the newsgroups.
> 
> Wait, binary broke between 8.0 and Phoebe?  I thought Phoebe used gcc
> 3.2 and glibc 2.3, or did I not look close enough?  (I'm not on my
> Phoebe=home machine at the moment.)
> 
> Are they going to go to gcc 3.3 or 3.4, then?



-- 
Phoebe-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/phoebe-list
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.