Re: Pre-announcement?
M A Young <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.redhat.release.phoebe |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Mon, 24 Mar 2003, The Matt wrote: > On Mon, 2003-03-24 at 13:45, William Hooper wrote: > > Binary compatibility. RH always goes to x.0 when they don't preserve > > binary compatibility. Now you know why some people (like me) think it was > > silly to be calling it RH 8.1 beta in the newsgroups. > > Wait, binary broke between 8.0 and Phoebe? I thought Phoebe used gcc > 3.2 and glibc 2.3, or did I not look close enough? (I'm not on my > Phoebe=home machine at the moment.) The differences due to the kernel/glibc changes are significent, and break lots of packages, due to being more sensitive to bugs, and due to more POSIX compatible signal handling. Michael Young -- Phoebe-list mailing list [email protected] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/phoebe-list