Re: RHL 9 - concerns
Chris Tooley <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.redhat.release.phoebe |
|---|---|
| Organization | Home |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Tue, 2003-03-25 at 12:58, joe wrote: > Andreas-Johann Ulvestad wrote: > > >Exactly - lots of fun, using 5 years convincing customers that it's more > >cost effective to run Linux instead.. > > > Didn't have to convince anybody - customers > have been calling me because they want linux. > > >and now they say "but in windows, we > >can get updates for free, we don't need to pay yearly licenses".. > > > Ah, they haven't heard about licensing 6.0 - > > Plus all the constant virus updates - ugh... > Good Point. I might not have to pay for Windows "Updates" but I certainly have to pay for my yearly (actually bi-annual) subscription fees to McAfee that far outweigh the cost of a RHN subscription. Chris > I'll take RH any day over that nonsense - > > Joe > > -- Phoebe-list mailing list [email protected] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/phoebe-list