Re: Questions for anti-.0 folks...

Getting back to discussion of the actual changes to the overall approach
to the distro...

I can see why a group of people on a mailing list for a bleeding edge
beta product would be in so much furor over the new slow 12-18 month
release model on the new enterprise product line.

On Tue, 2003-03-25 at 12:08, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 25, 2003 at 11:54:17AM -0800, Joseph Phillips wrote:
> > This debate is insignificant.  Whether called 8.1 or 9, the code is
> > still the same.  So from a logical point of view, this debate is
> > meaningless.
> 
> Unless you listen to what Matt Wilson had to say: the change from x.y
> numbering to just x *is* actually indicative of a major change in the
> overall approach to the distro. That's significant.
> 
> -- 
> Matthew Miller           [email protected]        <http://www.mattdm.org/>
> Boston University Linux      ------>                <http://linux.bu.edu/>
> 
> 



-- 
Phoebe-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/phoebe-list