Re: Questions for anti-.0 folks...
Matt Wilson <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.redhat.release.phoebe |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Tue, Mar 25, 2003 at 03:08:09PM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Tue, Mar 25, 2003 at 11:54:17AM -0800, Joseph Phillips wrote: > > This debate is insignificant. Whether called 8.1 or 9, the code is > > still the same. So from a logical point of view, this debate is > > meaningless. > > Unless you listen to what Matt Wilson had to say: the change from x.y > numbering to just x *is* actually indicative of a major change in the > overall approach to the distro. That's significant. But the actual scope of changes from one release to the next will vary depending on the kinds of developments that are going on in the Open Source communities, and what kind of development Red Hat wants to contribute through Red Hat Linux development cycle. The release number is really just there to provide an identifier from one release to the next. Cheers, Matt [email protected] -- Matt Wilson Manager, Base Operating Systems Red Hat, Inc. -- Phoebe-list mailing list [email protected] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/phoebe-list