Re: RHL 9 - concerns
Matthew Miller <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.redhat.release.phoebe |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Wed, Mar 26, 2003 at 06:43:00PM -0500, Brent Fox wrote: > Hi Matt. I hope I didn't sound defensive...I didn't mean to be. I just wanted to make sure you didn't feel like we were a bunch of antagonistic whiners. > clearly it won't please everyone. There's a delicate balance between > what's best for us and what's best for our users and we're still trying > to figure out how to achieve that. Understood. I'm just suggesting -- a number of us are suggesting, actually -- that maybe three more months of errata for the basic release would end up being better for *all* of us. I don't have any research to back this up, but I bet if you look, you'll find that almost all ES/AS customers were customers of the basic release first. If you really want to make sure people get hooked, make sure that the regular boxed set is still a product people can count on for serious use. Then, when that use becomes even more serious, you'll have big-money customers. *Happy* big-money customers. -- Matthew Miller [email protected] <http://www.mattdm.org/> Boston University Linux ------> <http://linux.bu.edu/> -- Phoebe-list mailing list [email protected] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/phoebe-list