Re: RHL 9 - concerns
Gregory Leblanc <[email protected]> 29 Mar 2003 09:51:52 -0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.redhat.release.phoebe |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <1048960311.2060.11.camel@gregdell> |
On Sat, 2003-03-29 at 03:14, Mike A. Harris wrote: > On Tue, 25 Mar 2003, Andreas-Johann Ulvestad wrote: > > >I see the main problem with this _INSANE_ lack of binary compability > >development. I mean - we were just starting to compile and test things for > >RHL 8, when we haveto scrap everything again since binary compability is > >broken.. again. > > What binary incompatibility are you seeing? Programs compiled against libguile aren't compatible. I haven't found any other specific brokenness yet, except that which can be blamed on the application. Greg
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQA+hd03nAkVXO6fw4sRAqO1AJ4vOLOz88yVeFPK64RNqtxJ/ygQaACeLy1n jV4VgGstNMF9uagc7AyGydI= =D8J0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----