Re: RHL 9 - concerns
"Mike A. Harris" <[email protected]> Sat, 29 Mar 2003 13:46:32 -0500 (EST)
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.redhat.release.phoebe |
|---|---|
| Organization | Red Hat Inc. |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 29 Mar 2003, Gregory Leblanc wrote: >> >I see the main problem with this _INSANE_ lack of binary compability >> >development. I mean - we were just starting to compile and test things for >> >RHL 8, when we haveto scrap everything again since binary compability is >> >broken.. again. >> >> What binary incompatibility are you seeing? > >Programs compiled against libguile aren't compatible. I haven't found >any other specific brokenness yet, except that which can be blamed on >the application. Hmm. What is the bugzilla ID for this problem. I wouldn't mind having a look at it. -- Mike A. Harris ftp://people.redhat.com/mharris OS Systems Engineer - XFree86 maintainer - Red Hat -- Phoebe-list mailing list [email protected] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/phoebe-list