Re: RHL 9 - concerns
Gregory Leblanc <[email protected]> 29 Mar 2003 20:10:19 -0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.redhat.release.phoebe |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <1048997418.2060.15.camel@gregdell> |
On Sat, 2003-03-29 at 10:46, Mike A. Harris wrote: > On 29 Mar 2003, Gregory Leblanc wrote: > > >> >I see the main problem with this _INSANE_ lack of binary compability > >> >development. I mean - we were just starting to compile and test things for > >> >RHL 8, when we haveto scrap everything again since binary compability is > >> >broken.. again. > >> > >> What binary incompatibility are you seeing? > > > >Programs compiled against libguile aren't compatible. I haven't found > >any other specific brokenness yet, except that which can be blamed on > >the application. > > Hmm. What is the bugzilla ID for this problem. I wouldn't mind > having a look at it. Bug number 84990. Greg
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQA+hm4pnAkVXO6fw4sRAju3AJ9ue7onydlPhaOwNMAScwf0XN3UCQCfZ2tp JRDIXGAfNKWTeIFBdN8XipY= =h4uI -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----