Re: nano editor in Shrike?

On Mon, Mar 31, 2003 at 10:45:10AM -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> recommendations?  i've heard good things about mutt, although
> i've never tried it yet.  (and the religious fervor of muttheads
> can be just a bit disturbing. :-)

Mutt is good. It induces fervor because it's very geeky -- lots and lots of
config options, and the ability to set it up to act pretty much exactly how
you want.

-- 
Matthew Miller           [email protected]        <http://www.mattdm.org/>
Boston University Linux      ------>                <http://linux.bu.edu/>



-- 
Phoebe-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/phoebe-list