Re: nano editor in Shrike?

Jeremy Portzer <[email protected]> 31 Mar 2003 12:03:24 -0500
Newsgroups gmane.linux.redhat.release.phoebe
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Mon, 2003-03-31 at 11:45, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> On Mon, 31 Mar 2003, Edward S. Marshall wrote:
> 
> > I'm now flipping back and forth between mutt, evolution, and squirrelmail,
> > depending on where I am and what kind of environment I have available, all
> > three bolting up to courier-imap (I would LOVE to see that added as an
> > alternative IMAP daemon to the regular distribution, ala Postfix vs.
> > Sendmail).
> 
> so all of mutt, evolution and squirrelmail are politely sharing
> your mail folders?  
> 

Not speaking for Edward, but I'll bet his answer is "of course!"

I use pine, evolution, mozilla, and squirrelmail completely
interchangeably thanks to IMAP.  For the best "politeness" in sharing
though, you'll need a backend format other than the default *nix "mbox"
format.  I use the MBX format that's provided by UW in the UW-IMAP
suite, but I think Maildir is another good alternative.  

Hope this helps,
Jeremy

-- 
/=====================================================================\
| Jeremy Portzer       [email protected]       trilug.org/~jeremy     |
| GPG Fingerprint: 712D 77C7 AB2D 2130 989F  E135 6F9F F7BC CC1A 7B92 |
\=====================================================================/
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQA+iHTcb5/3vMwae5IRAjyYAJ4hsgHywKtrZq/YCB7GgIT+mzpqJgCcCpPJ
8jwMJpwn5DZOwosGab1dQ1Y=
=278e
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----