Re: nano editor in Shrike?

Havoc Pennington wrote:

>On Sun, Mar 30, 2003 at 10:20:25PM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
>  
>
>>Webmin is highly unlikely to be included -- Red Hat has all their own fancy
>>new GUI config tools. And I don't think adding big complicated perl app is
>>in the cards.
>>    
>>
>
>Though, I think we understand that GUI config tools aren't meeting
>exactly the same need as a remote config tool.
>  
>

So maybe the GUI should be separated from the config file back-end? 
 Sorta like GST?  ;)

I'm sure that I don't have to tell you about them, but for the uninitiated:
http://www.gnome.org/projects/gst/

Among the architectural benefits:
* XML configuration profiles can be generated on one system and exported 
to another, allowing an administrator to change settings for an entire 
workgroup at once.
* XML configuration profiles can be archived, permitting the "undo" feature.
* Every time a tool modifies your system configuration files, it makes 
backups of those files. The backups are rotated (for 9 levels in total), 
and the backup made the first time the tool was run is kept forever. 
This means that you can revert your system configuration to the point 
before you ever ran a GNOME System Tool.

Will Red Hat's tools ever adopt such an architecture?



-- 
Phoebe-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/phoebe-list