Re: nano editor in Shrike?

On Sun, 30 Mar 2003, Tom Diehl wrote:

>Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2003 21:29:19 -0500 (EST)
>From: Tom Diehl <[email protected]>
>To: [email protected]
>Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
>List-Id: <phoebe-list.redhat.com>
>Subject: Re: nano editor in Shrike?
>
>On 31 Mar 2003, Michael Wardle wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 2003-03-31 at 12:01, Jesse Keating wrote:
>> > Um, I thought pine was depreciated, not fully removed yet.  Am I wrong?
>> 
>> Yes, you're right, it's *deprecated*. ;-)
>> 
>> Someone recently made a post sounding quite annoyed at its removal, so I
>> assumed it must have been removed, but a little research confirms it's
>> merely deprecated.
>> 
>> Anyway, it would still be nice for there to be a lightweight
>> command-line editor that is easy to learn.  Nano has been included in
>> the past, and I hope Red Hat will again include it in future.
>
>Does it not have the same licansing problem pine has?? I love pine and hate
>to see it depreciated (which means it will eventaully go) but I can see
>why they are doing that. It has to be a pita to maintain.
>
>Maybe it is time to look for a replacment.

"deprecated", not "depreciated".  2 words spelled similarly, and 
of which have similar but different meaning.  Don't mean to 
nitpick, but this is one of those "word pet peeves".  ;o)


-- 
Mike A. Harris     ftp://people.redhat.com/mharris
OS Systems Engineer - XFree86 maintainer - Red Hat



-- 
Phoebe-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/phoebe-list