Re: nano editor in Shrike?

On Tue, 1 Apr 2003, Mike A. Harris wrote:

> On 31 Mar 2003, Michael Wardle wrote:
> 
> >> Does it not have the same licansing problem pine has??
> >
> >UW Pico does, GNU Nano does not, hence the request for Nano to be
> >included before or when Pico is dropped.
> 
> nano is unlikely to be included as long as pine is included in 
> the distro.  Once pine is officially removed from the distro, 
> nano is a possibility if someone is willing to maintain it I 
> guess.

Since last I knew you were the maintainer of pine, how much longer do I have
to find a replacment. I know I have at least 6 months since that is the approx.
time to next release but......

Seriously though, have you found a good replacment for pine? If so what is it?

-- 
.............Tom	"Nothing would please me more than being able to 
[email protected]	hire ten programmers and deluge the hobby market 
			with good software." -- Bill Gates 1976

   			We are still waiting ....



-- 
Phoebe-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/phoebe-list