Re: nano editor in Shrike?

Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 01, 2003 at 09:18:49AM -0500, Tom Diehl wrote:
> 
>>Seriously though, have you found a good replacment for pine? 
>>If so what is it?
> 
> 
> In all seriousness: in what way is mutt _not_ a good replacement for pine?
> Sure, it's got configurationitis, but these days, aren't people who are
> looking for an e-mail client that Just Works (a la Havoc) going to go for an
> X11-based option? Or webmail, even.
> 

Not for root accounts, or slow modem connections. I tried mutt a few 
years ago, and went back to pine. I guess I can always use less, but for 
a quick mail check or reply pine has been great. Guess it's time to 
learn the emacs mail mode...

	-Thomas



-- 
Phoebe-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/phoebe-list