Re: nano editor in Shrike?

On Tue, Apr 01, 2003 at 10:27:44AM -0600, Thomas Dodd wrote:
> Not for root accounts, or slow modem connections. I tried mutt a few 
> years ago, and went back to pine. I guess I can always use less, but for 
> a quick mail check or reply pine has been great. Guess it's time to 
> learn the emacs mail mode...

Well, I guess. But really, mutt's "unconfigured" defaults are workable too.
It's not like pine's all that great for usability itself.

-- 
Matthew Miller           [email protected]        <http://www.mattdm.org/>
Boston University Linux      ------>                <http://linux.bu.edu/>



-- 
Phoebe-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/phoebe-list