Re: nano editor in Shrike?

On Tue, Apr 01, 2003 at 01:24:57PM -0500, Mike A. Harris wrote:
> mutt is not a good replacement for pine in the exact same way 
> that vi is not a good replacement for emacs, emacs is not a good 
> replacement for vi, ford is not a good replacement for chevy, 
> chevy is not a good replacement for ford, carob is not a good 
> replacement for chocolate, etc.

Vi *is* a good replacement for emacs. :)

No, but seriously, this is irrelevant to my point. As you said, there's no
reason to _stop_ using pine just because Red Hat doesn't ship it. But there
*is* good reason for Red Hat to continue to ship _a_ good text-based e-mail
client, and mutt fills that niche.



-- 
Matthew Miller           [email protected]        <http://www.mattdm.org/>
Boston University Linux      ------>                <http://linux.bu.edu/>



-- 
Phoebe-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/phoebe-list