Re: Shrike ISOs...
Stephen Robert Norris <[email protected]> 02 Apr 2003 09:05:55 +1000
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.redhat.release.phoebe |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Wed, 2003-04-02 at 07:29, [email protected] wrote: > I think legality would be hard to fight with the nature of RHL. That said, it > may not be ethical. It depends on how you look at it, for a paying RHN customer > such as myself, the 72 hour download time for shrike ISOs is bad as well. For a > non paying customer, well, you decide for yourself. Took me 1 hour from files.bigpond.net.au - which is only available to Telstra broadband users. Seems like RH needs to do some work to make a subscription worth it - taking 72 times as long, and costing me > $US100 for network traffic doesn't really inspire me to start paying them the $AUD110 per year they want... > I do think this whole ordeal was a big mistake. Sell Red Hat customers on this > new service, based on one feature. And that feature is so slow as to be > useless... seems it would be bad for business. On the other hand, to those of > us who have been paying RHN subscribers for the past year or so, this is the > first time we have had any issues with ISOs on release day. > > Just my $.02 Stephen -- Phoebe-list mailing list [email protected] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/phoebe-list