Re: RHL 9 - concerns

Mike A. Harris wrote:
> On Sun, 30 Mar 2003, David Krider wrote:
> 
> 
>>That's just it, Mike. For a long time, we've *have* gotten something -- 
>>a very good something -- for nothing but our time, when it comes to 
>>linux, specifically Red Hat linux. Many of us *knew* how good of a thing 
>>we had, and we're missing it already. Just a couple months ago, my 
>>coworker was telling me that he was convinced that Red Hat would start 
>>charging for *all* of their linux distributions. I told him I would be 
>>happy to do it if forced to. It's just that I thought I'd be forking 
>>over the $80 for the boxed set, and still be getting 3 years of errata. 
>>I think we all understand Red Hat's position. We've just been spoiled, 
>>that's all. ;-)
> 
> 
> Spoiled indeed.  ;o)  Well, everyone will continue to be spoiled 
> as Red Hat Linux will continue to be free for download, etc.
> 
> It would cause serious disruption to the universe and a glitch in 
> the matrix if Red Hat Linux were to cease being free.  I assure 
> you of that.  ;o)
> 
> 

That is welcomed news! I was feeling a bit uncomfortable with thought of 
  avenues for free usage being severed.

Jim

-- 
Getting the job done is no excuse for not following the rules.

Corollary:
	Following the rules will not get the job done.



-- 
Phoebe-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/phoebe-list