Re: nano editor in Shrike?

On Tue, 1 Apr 2003, Mike A. Harris wrote:

> Even when it does get removed from the distribution, I will
> continue to create and maintain "unofficial" pine packages on a
> personal volunteer basis for people to use with Red Hat Linux.  
> At that time, they'll not be supported by Red Hat, and they'll be 
> "use at own risk" or in other words "caveat emptor".  I plan on 
> maintaining pine packages as long as it isn't an overly large 
> burden on me, and as long as the people using the packages are 
> friendly and polite, and not demanding and/or rude.

Oh cool!! Thanks.

> So don't feel that you _have_ to stop using pine, if you really 
> don't want to stop.  You won't have to, unless you've got some 
> kind of requirement that it be part of a default OS install or 
> automated install of some kind, and even then there are ways to 
> manage that with kickstart.

I do not think I am being forced to change. I was/am just using it
as an excuse to look at the other text based solutions out there.
I really like pine and I may very well stay with it especially given
your above statment. ;o)

> Hope this clears things up.

Yes, thanks again.

-- 
.............Tom	"Nothing would please me more than being able to 
[email protected]	hire ten programmers and deluge the hobby market 
			with good software." -- Bill Gates 1976

   			We are still waiting ....



-- 
Phoebe-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/phoebe-list