Re: Adaptec AHA-1480 SCSI PCMCIA card in RH7.1.
Ian Firla <[email protected]> Sun, 13 Apr 2003 08:07:36 -0400 (EDT)
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.redhat.release.seawolf |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
You do have scsi support built into the kernel, right?
Ian
On Sun, 13 Apr 2003, My_SeaWolf wrote:
> I am trying to get this SCSI card to work in my RH7.1-based system
> (because I have a SCSI CD-RW drive from HP, that I want to use).
>
> When the system boots, I see some messages, which indicate that the card
> gets recognized from the OS. Also, when I enter KDE Command Center,
> the controller is present in the "Information" tab (PCI & PCMCIA
> sections), as well as the "System" tab ("KDE System Control" section).
>
> However, it is not displayed in the "SCSI" section of the "Information"
> tab of the KDE Command Center and I cannot find any device (/dev/sda*,
> /dev/scd*, etc.) in the "/dev" directory to mount to the "/mnt/cdrom"
> directory. "/dev/cdrom" does not exist and "/dev/scd*", "/dev/sda*" give
> back the message "unknown device" (when used in the "mount" command).
>
> Has anybody used this hardware in RH7.1 before and, if yes, how? I do
> not want to upgrade my RH7.1 partition to a newer version, because I
> mainly use it in order to run some business software, certified for this
> release (I have a separate RH8 partition on the same hard disk drive for
> the rest of my work...).
>
> TIA,
> --
> Panos Platon Tsapralis,
> SAP-R/3 specialist, ABAP/4 developer,
> Registered Linux User #305894,
> Mozilla Mail Handler on Red Hat Linux 7.1 (SeaWolf),
> Athens, GREECE,
> cell-phone: +306946462857,
> e-mail: [email protected], [email protected]
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Seawolf-list mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/seawolf-list
>
------------
Dr Ian Firla
Robert Graves Trust | "A partial count of the software available
St John's College, Oxford | in just one noncommerical Linux system
OX1 3JP - +44-(0)7855-310565 | would have cost about $1.9 billion to develop
http://www.robertgraves.org | ... the way Microsoft does it" Bruce Perens