Re: Request for recommended Utilization Monitoring Tool

"James P. Roberts" <[email protected]> Fri, 31 Oct 2003 21:39:58 -0500
Newsgroups gmane.linux.redhat.release.seawolf
Organization Punster Productions, Inc.
Message-ID <03de01c3a021$7a1ea720$04fea8c0@localnet>
> Subject: Request for  recommended Utilization Monitoring Tool
> Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2003 16:58:41 -0500
> From: "Martinez, Michael" <[email protected]>
<snip>
> Hi guys -=20
>
> A few weeks ago I posted a request for "System Monitoring Tool." I
> received many good responses, but I realized that I must have phrased my
> request incorrectly, because the software that people recommended is not
> what I am looking for.
>
> Hence the repost under a slightly different subject line.
>
> What I'm looking for is a recommended "Utilization Monitoring Tool" that
> keeps a local record of cpu load, load average, number of processes,
> network usage, memory usage (plus other performance characteristics if
> available) and produces historic graphs of this data.
>
> Preferably I'd like something that is maintained, and does not require
> snmp or a running X server.
>
> I looked at "HotSaNIC" and it's a cool tool, and the developer is
> responsive, however on my systems it has been buggy and the
> documentation is not maintained.
>
> Regards,
> =20
> Michael Martinez
> USMax Corporation
> ISTM/CSREES
> United States Department of Agriculture
> (202) 720-6223
<snip>

Ummm...  I think "top" does all (or at least most) the data collection you
appear to require.  It's the part about "produces historic graphs of this
data" combined with "does not require ... a running X server" that sounds
difficult.  Perhaps you could set "top" running to collect the data, and then
use an off-line plotting package to visualize the data?  At least this way,
you could begin data collection sooner, and capture data while you investigate
plotting/formatting tools.

Regards,
Jim