Re: Samba--Connection Refused

Whoops. 2.2.7a. It looks like my memory was bit spotty. How I drifted off to 
[3].2.7[b] I don't know. I'm using samba-2.2.7a-8.9.0.i386.rpm and the other three 
packages. They are all on <ftp://updates.redhat.com/9/en/os/i386/>.

Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Dec 2004 17:07:47 -0800, Wayne Watson wrote:
> 
> 
>>Actually the 3.0.9-... was for RH.
> 
> 
> You should be using software which is built for Red Hat Linux 9.
> 
> Latest Samba for RHL9 is Samba 2.2.7a-8.9.0 from Red Hat or Samba
> 2.2.12-0.90.2.legacy from Fedora Legacy for RHL9:
> 
> http://www.fedoralegacy.org/updates/RH9/2004-10-14-FLSA_2004_2102__Updated_samba_packages_fix_security_vulnerability__updated_.html
> 
> 
>>It was just incomplete. It should have contained 
>>common, and two others. I then used rpm to erase all the samba related packages. Then 
>>I installed the four 3.2.7b packages. Everthing went according to Hoyle.
> 
> 
> Not even Fedora Core 2 included Samba 3.0.8. Only FC3 comes with 3.0.9:
> 
>   $ rpm -q samba
>   samba-3.0.9-1.fc3
> 
> If you're installing other packages not made for Red Hat Linux 9,
> you're fully unsupported. Not even /usr/sbin/swat seems to work for
> you. Can't do anything for you if swat doesn't listen to port 901.
> Time to go back to a tested installation and configuration and try
> to reproduce in that environment. 
> 

-- 
              Wayne T. Watson (Watson Adventures, Prop., Nevada City, CA)
                  (121.015 Deg. W, 39.262 Deg. N) GMT-8 hr std. time)
                   Obz Site:  39° 15' 7" N, 121° 2' 32" W, 2700 feet
             (Formerly Homo habilis, erectus, heidelbergensis and now sapiens)

                     "There's no such thing as a stupid question,
                      but they're the easiest to answer!" -- anon.

                         Web Page: <home.earthlink.net/~mtnviews>


-- 
Shrike-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/shrike-list