Re: upgrading suggestions request
"James Stanhope" <[email protected]> Mon, 19 Feb 2007 08:35:34 +1100
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.redhat.release.shrike |
|---|---|
| Organization | Plus-One Information Services |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I moved my servers onto Centos 4.4 (built on RH EL4) a couple of months ago without too much trouble. I chose Centos because it is stable, has good support, and uses the RH architecture which I am familiar with. For my desktops I have been trying out Ubuntu 6.06, which seems to be quite good. I chose it because it also is stable and has good support, and is very well integrated (Mozilla, OpenOffice, etc). Hope this helps. On Sun, 18 Feb 2007 03:50:22 +1100, Ralph E. Kenyon, Jr. <[email protected]> wrote: > I have been using Redhat 9 steadily for some time now. > Now that it has lost all its support, with the complete close of the > legacy effort, it would seem that moving to another distribution might > eventually be needed. > > I used Shrike as both a local development web page server and as a > desktop with browser clients. I'd like to use it for much more, but I'm > stuck with WordPerfect and FrontPage on my windows unit. > I use Apache and Tux to serve local copies of multiple domains. > Entering my domain url's without the www gets the local copy, with the > www gets the internet copy. It works seamlessly. > > I'd like to get some recomendations for what distribution to consider > for my next Linux, hopefully with a minimum of trouble. > > Unfortunately, many of the people in a position to provide a > recommendation have probably dropped this list, but I'll ask anyway. > > I've noted one person suggested Scientific Linux 3 <url: > https://www.scientificlinux.org/ > as being most like Redhat 9. > > What distribution would you dedicated redhat 9 users recommend for my > next installation (and why)? > > Thanks! > -- Shrike-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/shrike-list