Re: maximum partition size for RHEL

"Eric Warnke" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.hardware.dell.poweredge,gmane.linux.redhat.release.nahant.general,gmane.linux.redhat.release.taroon.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
I have had nothing but trouble using MSDOS partition types on devices larger
than 2TB ( eg Apple XRaid ).  Using fdisk/msdos partitions APPEARED to work,
but on reboot would shrink down to partition-2Tb in size and results in fs
corruption.  Using parted and gpt works around that issue.

On systems the size you are talking, you should also be using LVM.  I never,
initially, make the partition fill the drive.  I leave room for snapshots
and latter growth.  Using LVM also means that scsi device renumbering will
not affect your mountpoint ( a huge plus ).

Cheers,
Eric

On 4/18/06, wolf2k5 <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> We're running several Dell PowerEdge 1850 servers with RHEL3 U7 and
> RHEL3 U3, some of them running the i686 version, others running the
> x86_64 version.
>
> We use an iSCSI array for data storage, only the server OS is stored
> on the local HD.
>
> Some of the servers use the Linux iSCSI initiator (software), while
> others use the QLogic iSCSI HBA (hardware).
>
> We usually create a pretty big volume (several TBs) on the iSCSI array
> and then create one or more (up to 4) primary partitions on it.
>
> We use the standard partion table (MS-DOS), not the new one (GPT).
>
> We use use ext3 as filesystem type.
>
> What is the maximum partition size that we can safely use in such
> environment?
>
> I found a good resource about system configuration limits on the RH web
> site:
> http://www.redhat.com/rhel/details/limits/
>
> Unfortunately  it doesn't include the maximum partition size, though
> it includes  the maximum filesystem size. Can I safely assume that the
> first value is equal to the latter?
>
> IIRC, I read somewhere that the maximum partition size is 2TB.
> If so, how does RHEL4 support 8TB partitions, as per their web site?
>
> Also, we've the ability to create a filesystem directly on the iSCSI
> volume without creating a partition at all, e.g. mkfs.ext3 /dev/sdb
> instead of mkfs.ext3 /dev/sdb1.
> I don't know if that is possible with a regular HD at all, it appears
> to work fine with an iSCSI volume.
> What are the pros and the cons of creating a filesystem w/o a partition?
>
> Thanks.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-PowerEdge mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.us.dell.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-poweredge
> Please read the FAQ at http://lists.us.dell.com/faq
>

_______________________________________________
Linux-PowerEdge mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.us.dell.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-poweredge
Please read the FAQ at http://lists.us.dell.com/faq
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.