Re: ES3 update 8 has severe problems with

orrie <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.redhat.release.taroon.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>

Leinweber, James <jiml@...> writes:

> 
> On any server with the "pvm" package installed, which seems to creep
> in by default, running "up2date -u" on 2006-July-20 dies with the
> message:
> 
>   error: unpacking of archive failed on file
>     /usr/share/pvm3/bin/LINUXI386: cpio:  rename failed - Is a directory
> 
> This leaves the system in a very unfortunate state, with the updates
> partially applied, and about 50 RPM's missing in action, including
> rather important things such as "openssh-server".  With a lot of
> hand work using "rpm", 'find ... -name "*.rpm*" -print' and the like I
> was able to get a couple of systems past that.  Examples of the kind
> of things that helped me the most are:
> 
>    # clean large objects out of /usr to avoid undue *.rpmnew files
>    # and /usr mis-estimates of available space
>    # people who use them reinstall with rpm -i or up2date afterwards
> 
>    rpm -e psgml apel-xemacs emacs emacs-leim  xemacs xemacs-el \
>      xemacs-info openoffice.org openoffice.org-i18n openoffice.org-libs
> 
> In a fairly clean /var/spool/up2date or other hand directory with
> only the downloaded update 8 rpm files:
> 
>   rm pvm*
>   rpm -Fvh --force up2date*rpm rpm*rpm
>   rm up2date* rpm*
>   rpm -Fvh kernel-{util,doc,source}*rpm
>   rm kernel-{util,doc,source}*rpm
>   rpm -Uvh --force *.rpm
>   up2date -p
>   up2date kernel-utils kernel  # or kernel-smp, or whatever
> 
> This may leave you with about 900 *.rpmorig or *.rpmnew conflicts to
> resolve, particularly if you have squid installed, but less than a
> dozen are real, so doing something like:
> 
>   find /etc /usr -type f -ctime -1 -name "*.rpm*" -print |
>    while read f; do if cmp -s $f ${f%.rpm*}; then rm $f; fi; done
> 
> may improve the situation a lot.
> 
>    
> a) is anyone else having this problem?
> 
> b) BEWARE!  You probably want to avoid running "up2date" on systems
> with "pvm" installed unless you are a masochist.
> 
> c) applying update 8 using Redhat Network went very smoothly for me on
> a system which didn't have "pvm" installed.
> 
> I note that 
>    rpm -q --whatrequires pvm
> didn't suggest any dependencies, so those of us not doing parallel
> distributed programming may want to do "rpm -e pvm; up2date -p" as
> a workaround before trying to apply update 8.
> 

We have over 250 RedHat WS 3 update 8 systems running and all of the ones which
had the pvm package failed in a similar manner to yours.  Furthermore, if you
remove the pvm package with an "rpm -e pvm" and then try to reinstall it with an
"up2date -i pvm", you will receive the following.  You also receive this same
error when trying to install pvm on a WS 3 update 8 system which did not have
pvm installed previously.  It appears this package was not properly built before
being added.  Anyone else receive similar results?

orrie@host > up2date -i pvm

Fetching Obsoletes list for channel: rhel-i386-ws-3...

Fetching rpm headers...
########################################

Name                                    Version        Rel
----------------------------------------------------------
pvm                                     3.4.5          6_EL3             i386


Testing package set / solving RPM inter-dependencies...
########################################
pvm-3.4.5-6_EL3.i386.rpm:   ########################## Done.
Preparing              ########################################### [100%]

Installing...
   1:pvm                    ########################################### [100%]
error: unpacking of archive failed on file /usr/share/pvm3/bin/LINUXI386: cpio:
rename
There was a fatal RPM install error. The message was:
There was a rpm unpack error installing the package: pvm-3.4.5-6_EL3

  Orrie




--
Taroon-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/taroon-list
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.