Re: Opinions AMD64 vs EM64T vs Itanium II
Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.redhat.release.nahant.general,gmane.linux.redhat.release.taroon.general |
|---|---|
| Organization | Intel International BV |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> > Are there any technical reasons to prefer AMD64 (Opteron), EM64T > (Xeon) or Itanium II CPUs? Are there things that don't work in RedHat > on any of those platforms with either RHEL3 or RHEL4? > > Beyond that, we are currently running 32-bit on 32bit Xeon processors > - I'm think I can also run 32-bit RedHat on either the AMD64 or EM64T > chips - is that correct? you can run a 32 bit OS on x86-64 (EM64T and AMD64) yes. If you really care about 32 bit application compatibility I would have to say that Itanium II isn't really for you; while if you want to run native number crunching applications, Itanium might be an option. (People and magazines tend to laugh a bit about Itanium; for certain applications, especially number crunching it's a great CPU) While there is 32 bit application compatibility on Itanium, it's not as smooth and transparent as it is on x86-64; if you really depend on this heavily I would consider a nice Xeon 5100 series box :) The one limit you have with a 32 bit OS is the total amount of memory; you don't really want to go over 32Gb, and even 16Gb can have issues... -- if you want to mail me at work (you don't), use arjan (at) linux.intel.com