Re: Opinions AMD64 vs EM64T vs Itanium II

Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.redhat.release.nahant.general,gmane.linux.redhat.release.taroon.general
Organization Intel International BV
Message-ID <[email protected]>
> 
> Are there any technical reasons to prefer AMD64 (Opteron), EM64T
> (Xeon) or Itanium II CPUs? Are there things that don't work in RedHat
> on any of those platforms with either RHEL3 or RHEL4? 
> 
> Beyond that, we are currently running 32-bit on 32bit Xeon processors
> - I'm think I can also run 32-bit RedHat on either the AMD64 or EM64T
> chips - is that correct?

you can run a 32 bit OS on x86-64 (EM64T and AMD64) yes. If you really
care about 32 bit application compatibility I would have to say that
Itanium II isn't really for you; while if you want to run native number
crunching applications, Itanium might be an option. (People and
magazines tend to laugh a bit about Itanium; for certain applications,
especially number crunching it's a great CPU)

While there is 32 bit application compatibility on Itanium, it's not as
smooth and transparent as it is on x86-64; if you really depend on this
heavily I would consider a nice Xeon 5100 series box :)

The one limit you have with a 32 bit OS is the total amount of memory;
you don't really want to go over 32Gb, and even 16Gb can have issues...


-- 
if you want to mail me at work (you don't), use arjan (at) linux.intel.com
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.