RE: Problem - After a reboot, the *first* `mount -a -t nfs' gets stuck in `D'

"Gunnett, Eric" <egunnett-zC7DfRvBq/JWk0Htik3J/[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.redhat.release.taroon.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
	I am also seeing this issue, using NFS to ext3 mounts. We only
have one mount point on the client systems. Odd thing is it is hanging
on two servers out of dozens, with the same mount point.

Thanks,
--Eric Gunnett
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Keith Lewis
Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2006 10:00 PM
To: [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Re: Problem - After a reboot, the *first* `mount -a -t nfs'
gets stuck in `D'

RE:
> > 	The first mount process is still in D:
> > 
> > # ps auxww | grep mount
> > root 1880 0.0 0.0 3776 812 pts/0 D 10:48 0:00 mount -a -t nfs
> > root 2532 0.0 0.0 3688 672 pts/0 S 11:18 0:00 grep mount

> Do you have 'bg' in fstab for that mount?

	Yes.

	One of our two failing machines has two NFS mounts, both from 
a NFS server serving a pair of GFS disks.

	The other client has three mounts - one from a nearby NFS server

which serves its own hard disk, the other two are the same GFS via NFS
as
above.

	BUT - commenting out the GFS via NFS mounts on the second box
did 
not fix the problem.  (i.e. this problem appears not to be GFS related)

	They are `bg' in all cases e.g.

# grep /web/nfs /etc/fstab
<name>:/web/canon /web/nfs   nfs rw,bg,hard,intr,nodev,nosuid 0 0 
#

> Try 'ps xal' and see what's it doing.

# ps axl
F   UID   PID  PPID PRI  NI   VSZ  RSS WCHAN  STAT TTY        TIME
COMMAND
...
4     0  1880  1822  15   0  3776  812   end     D pts/0      0:00 mount
-a -t nfs

> -- 
>   Jussi

Keith

--
Taroon-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/taroon-list

--
Taroon-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/taroon-list
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.