Re: NFS Help! Terrible performance with sync, fast performance with async
"Stephen John Smoogen" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.redhat.release.taroon.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 11/21/06, Stephen John Smoogen <[email protected]> wrote: > > To be honest, this may be a place where Linux is just going to suck. > The NFS server stuff has a lot of issues to deal with.. and reading > http://nfsworld.blogspot.com/ (which I am guessing is from Sun ) there > are a lot of places where it hasnt been optimized. > -ENOCAFFEINE http://nfsworld.blogspot.com/ is from someone who has worked on NFS for a long time http://blogs.sun.com/erickustarz/ is from someone at sun http://nfs.sourceforge.net/ >From the faq.. Does your application open its files with the O_SYNC option? That will force NFS Version 3 to behave exactly like (synchronous) NFS Version 2. I think bonnie++ and cp do this unless told otherwise.. which could be why they bog down without sync. If the mention in the nfsworld blog are correct about file timeing.. this could also cause problems with any Linux NFS v2/v3 server. It would be interesting what the iozone comparisons between v2/v3/v4 would be. -- Stephen J Smoogen. -- CSIRT/Linux System Administrator How far that little candle throws his beams! So shines a good deed in a naughty world. = Shakespeare. "The Merchant of Venice" -- Taroon-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/taroon-list