Re: Bad Sectors on a SATA Drive
"Tom G. Christensen" <tgc-QOZTYAA+/Ks+nozOxzIu92SdvHPH+/[email protected]> Mon, 22 Jan 2007 09:08:54 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.redhat.release.taroon.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Sorry about the late answer... Lawrence Houston wrote: <snip> > Is a SATA Drive being claimed by libata and being exported as a SCSI > Device a good thing or a bad thing?? > It's the way libata works, it's a good thing. > Can someone with more experience reading SMART Data tell me the state of > this 160 GIG Seagate Drive??? It does NOT look very good, how immediate > does this "Pre-Fail" mean??? > I have no knowledge of how to interpret these values so I rely on the SMART selftest (-H) to tell me if the drive is bad. Since apparently the selftest passes I'd suggest you grab the vendor diagnostic tool (seatools in this case) and have it run a full scan of the drive. If seatools says the drive is good then it probably is and the problem lies elsewhere (bad or inadequate powersupply perhaps?) <snip smartctl output> -tgc -- Taroon-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/taroon-list