Re: Bad Sectors on a SATA Drive

"Tom G. Christensen" <tgc-QOZTYAA+/Ks+nozOxzIu92SdvHPH+/[email protected]> Mon, 22 Jan 2007 09:08:54 +0100
Newsgroups gmane.linux.redhat.release.taroon.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Sorry about the late answer...

Lawrence Houston wrote:
<snip>
> Is a SATA Drive being claimed by libata and being exported as a SCSI 
> Device a good thing or a bad thing??
>
It's the way libata works, it's a good thing.

> Can someone with more experience reading SMART Data tell me the state of 
> this 160 GIG Seagate Drive???  It does NOT look very good, how immediate 
> does this "Pre-Fail" mean???
> 
I have no knowledge of how to interpret these values so I rely on the 
SMART selftest (-H) to tell me if the drive is bad.
Since apparently the selftest passes I'd suggest you grab the vendor 
diagnostic tool (seatools in this case) and have it run a full scan of 
the drive. If seatools says the drive is good then it probably is and 
the problem lies elsewhere (bad or inadequate powersupply perhaps?)

<snip smartctl output>

-tgc

--
Taroon-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/taroon-list