Re: Recent changes to RPMforge (fwd)
Sam Sharpe <[email protected]> Fri, 19 Nov 2010 00:18:27 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.redhat.release.rhel5,gmane.linux.redhat.release.nahant.general,gmane.linux.redhat.release.rhel6,gmane.linux.redhat.release.taroon.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 18 November 2010 23:18, Dag Wieers <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > I wanted to let everyone know that with the release of RHEL6 we changed a > few things with regards to RPMforge. The most important aspect is that by > default RPMforge will _not_ replace base packages. > > All newer packages in RPMforge that update base package (eg. subversion) are > now stored in the rpmforge-extras repository, which is disabled by default. > > This change is effective immediately and affects RHEL2, RHEL3, RHEL4, RHEL5 > and RHEL6 repositories. This is great news for people who love RPMForge and would like to enable it without risk to their "supported" packages. I would like to I ask a follow-up question... If there is a package provided by EPEL, which is also provided by RPMForge (in a similar or updated version), will that package be in RPMForge or RPMForge-extras? The reason I ask this is because I have always been a fan of RPMForge, but my organisation is standardising on EPEL - and I would like to be able to safely enable both base repositories... -- Sam