Re: Delay? Looks bad for Fedora
seth vidal <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.redhat.rhl.beta,gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.testers |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <1068005133.1309.125.camel@binkley> |
> The problem comes in with the fact that no one in our department is > going to stand for a Fedora rollout/reinstall every 8 or so months.... > to say nothing of the fact that this schedule is going to put our 2 man > IT team into a permanent "get ready for the new release" mode. While I > realize that the Fedora Legacy project has been created to address > these sorts of needs, I guess I'm a little skeptical. > > I sincerely apologize for asking this because I mean no offense... but > is the Fedora Legacy Project going to be something that people like me > can truly depend on? Honestly, I think it will be. But as a counter point: Have you ever really been able to count on a company? I haven't. If red hat gets bought up and decides to change directions for some reason guess where you might be with RHEL? Screwed. That's where. You might have a contract that says they have to support you - but they can offer the minimum possible resources to do that and still be w/i the contract rules. NEVER trust a vendor b/c they are a vendor - I'd much rather trust other opensource developers to do the 'right thing' than I would to trust ANY company to do the 'right thing'. After all, the 'right thing' for a publicly held company is to make the most money for their shareholders. -sv -- fedora-test-list mailing list [email protected] http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list