Re: Delay? Looks bad for Fedora

seth vidal <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.redhat.rhl.beta,gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.testers
Message-ID <1068005133.1309.125.camel@binkley>
> The problem comes in with the fact that no one in our department is 
> going to stand for a Fedora rollout/reinstall every 8 or so months.... 
> to say nothing of the fact that this schedule is going to put our 2 man 
> IT team into a permanent "get ready for the new release" mode. While I 
> realize that the Fedora Legacy project has been created to address 
> these sorts of needs, I guess I'm a little skeptical.
> 
> I sincerely apologize for asking this because I mean no offense... but 
> is the Fedora Legacy Project going to be something that people like me 
> can truly depend on?

Honestly, I think it will be.

But as a counter point:
 Have you ever really been able to count on a company? I haven't.

If red hat gets bought up and decides to change directions for some
reason guess where you might be with RHEL? Screwed. That's where. You
might have a contract that says they have to support you - but they can
offer the minimum possible resources to do that and still be w/i the
contract rules.

NEVER trust a vendor b/c they are a vendor - I'd much rather trust other
opensource developers to do the 'right thing' than I would to trust ANY
company to do the 'right thing'. After all, the 'right thing' for a
publicly held company is to make the most money for their shareholders.

-sv





--
fedora-test-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.