Re: OOo PPC suport. [patchset !!]
seth vidal <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.redhat.rhl.beta,gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.testers |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <1068045275.30158.4.camel@opus> |
On Wed, 2003-11-05 at 10:11, Guy M. Streeter wrote: > On Wed, 2003-11-05 at 06:14, Paul Nasrat wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 10:00:25AM -0600, Guy M. Streeter wrote: > > > In > > > http://people.redhat.com/streeter/ > > > you'll find some rpms that will make an upgrade go more smoothly. > > > > Could you provide src.rpms too please :) > > > > > A version of yum that doesn't look in the ppc64 arch for ppc rpms. > > > > I assume you hacked archwork.py which is where the compat stuff is done. > > Could you post a diff please - I'm just curious as I've been looking at > > fixing this, and it's possible you've done this already so it works on > > both ppc64 with 32 bit compat and ppc32 only. > > Yes, I just took ppc64 out of the list in archwork.py. That means it > won't work for a ppc64 arch. It isn't a solution, it's a hack. :) I'm a bit confused -ppc64 binaries should archscore away from ever being used on a ppc machine - like athlon's archscore away from an i686. -sv -- fedora-test-list mailing list [email protected] http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list