Re: OOo PPC suport. [patchset !!]

"Guy M. Streeter" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.redhat.rhl.beta,gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.testers
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Wed, 2003-11-05 at 10:41, Jesse Keating wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> On Wednesday 05 November 2003 07:24, Guy M. Streeter wrote:
> > All I can tell you is that it didn't happen. yum tried to use ppc64
> > packages to resolve dependencies while upgrading my iMac.
> 
> This was due to an improperly built mkinird package that specifically 
> required a ppc64 package.  Yum actually noted the dep, but refused to 
> install the ppc64 package for me.  I pulled down the source rpm and 
> removed the erroneous Requires:.

No, the ppc64-utils package is not a ppc64 arch package. It is a ppc
arch package with "ppc64" in its name. The ppc64-utils package is not in
the  fedora repository, for ppc or ppc64 arch.

--Guy



--
fedora-test-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.