Re: md5sum doesn't match with BitTorrent

Jeremy Portzer <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.redhat.rhl.beta,gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.testers
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Wed, 2003-11-05 at 21:14, Paul W. Frields wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-11-05 at 18:30, Ben Steeves wrote:
> > Re. the person who was asking if checking MD5s is redundant -- you
> > should always check the MD5s before burning, at least to make sure the
> > ISO is OK.  Afterwards, media check should be sufficient.
> 
> Checking MD5's of a completed torrent d/l is redundant, because
> BitTorrent checks MD5 on each chunk it gets as it completes it.

To be pedantic, BitTorrent actually uses the SHA1 hash algorithm, not
MD5, though the effect is the same.

> Therefore the whole, if finished, will be fine automatically unless your
> disk has a media problem unrelated to the d/l. Read the protocol for
> more info.

True, but it can't hurt, and doesn't normally take long, to MD5-check
the .iso files also.

--Jeremy

-- 
/---------------------------------------------------------------------\
| Jeremy Portzer        [email protected]      trilug.org/~jeremy     |
| GPG Fingerprint: 712D 77C7 AB2D 2130 989F  E135 6F9F F7BC CC1A 7B92 |
\---------------------------------------------------------------------/
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQA/qlURb5/3vMwae5IRAqoKAJ4wtep5NLtkNV58Zy4eEAMQkpfbkgCfRezP
HVDHkcU/2t6q2bhX8frSsnk=
=o+vG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.