Re: apt-rpm supported?
"Michael P. Soulier" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.redhat.rhl.beta,gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.testers |
|---|---|
| Organization | Mitel Networks Corporation |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 06/11/03 Panu Matilainen did say:
> Apt-rpm is not at least currently supported in Fedora Core, however
> a) you can safely expect various mirrors to provide "apt-rpm enabled"
> repositories of it, including www.fedora.us and freshrpms.net.
> b) there's work going on to create a generic repository metadata format,
> meaning in practise any depsolver supporting that can be used to access
> any repository using that format, at which point there aren't
> yum/apt-rpm/up2date/red-carpet repositories, they simply become "package
> repositories" which you can access with your favorite client.
Ok, thanks.
Odd. I only looked into Fedora in the first place to use apt-rpm.
I'm quite surprised to hear that it's not yet officially supported. As a
long-time Debian user, it made me feel very comfortable on an rpm-based
distro.
Any good comparisons of the two? Can I install based on pathname,
libname in yum? Is the search facility as good as "apt-cache"?
Cheers,
Mike
--
Michael P. Soulier <[email protected]>, 613-592-2122 x2522
6000/6010/60* Development, Mitel Networks Corporation
"...the word HACK is used as a verb to indicate a massive amount
of nerd-like effort." -Harley Hahn, A Student's Guide to Unix
--
fedora-test-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list