Re: What partition type for large partitions?
roberto pallucchini <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.redhat.rhl.beta,gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.testers |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
i don't think is a good idea to use ext2, i mean ext3 or reiserFS is better, there are a journaled fs but ext2 no. ReiserFS is more faster than ext3 because ext3 is more complex to the fs system tracking and controlling. ReiserFS tracking a part of FS transaction. I mean if you use it in a server ext3 is better but you must have a good hd for have more performance! I use ext3 for both my pc, i haven't a very quick PC!! but work well... bye Roberto b r u ma wrote: >hi, >This is perhaps not appropriate question for [email protected] >list, but I don't where else to ask... >I'm installing Fedora Core 1 to my new hard drive (120G) :), and I want >to have one larger partition approx 85G as logical drive. > >What type (ext2, ext3, reiser) would be best solution, so that I don't >waste to much space on slack? > >regards bruma > > >-- >fedora-test-list mailing list >[email protected] >http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list > > > > -- /** * Roberto Pallucchini * * e-mail: [email protected] * web : www.palluk.ig3.net */ $Id: Poewred by Fedora Core 1 -- fedora-test-list mailing list [email protected] http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list