Re: OpenOffice.org 1.1.0-6.1
Boszormenyi Zoltan <[email protected]> Wed, 12 Nov 2003 13:58:48 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.redhat.rhl.beta,gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.testers |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi, Jakub Jelinek Ãrta: > Hi! > > The prelink friendly binary unfortunately is not the default in FC1, > but you can speed up OOo start by: > ln -sf soffice2.bin /usr/lib/openoffice/program/soffice.bin > as root. > > ftp://people.redhat.com/jakub/openoffice.org/ > contains openoffice.org-1.1.0-6.1 packages which differ from 1.1.0-6 as > present in FC1 in 2 things: > a) soffice2.bin is the default, so you don't have to run the above > command to speed it up > b) it has been compiled with -Os. This seems to save 9MB on allocated > library size and e.g. when running oowriter should cut the total > size of libraries loaded from around 71MB to ~ 66MB (by ~ 5.25MB). Is it the only difference? Here is the original, I already changed the softlink: # rpm -q openoffice.org openoffice.org-1.1.0-6 # cd /usr/lib/openoffice/program # ls -l soffice*.bin -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 446012 nov 3 23:33 soffice1.bin -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 70904 nov 3 23:33 soffice2.bin -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 555192 nov 3 23:33 soffice3.bin lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 12 nov 12 13:50 soffice.bin -> soffice1.bin The binary size difference is not what you describe, but much larger, oowriter starts up with a huge speed difference! -- Best regards, Zoltán Böszörményi --------------------- What did Hussein say about his knife? One in Bush worth two in the hand. -- fedora-test-list mailing list [email protected] http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list