Re: yum vs rpm.
seth vidal <[email protected]> 13 Nov 2003 08:51:27 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.redhat.rhl.beta,gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.testers |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <1068731486.4082.0.camel@opus> |
On Thu, 2003-11-13 at 08:27, Kevin Francis wrote: > Indeed. But the average user thinks this way: > > "Ohhhh apt-get is fast! Let's get that!" > > I kill yum regularly ( it's a reflex whenever i perform something I > don't want to ), and experience no lockups. > > ALL lockups on the list however are apt-related. I see a pattern. Yes, > yum is less feature complete, but ... pinning packages, and specifying > sources per package aren't what normal people do. > > Yes, right tool for the right job :) Simple > updates/upgrades/distro-upgrades are yum-able. Pinning etc. ... well the > power users can use apt. Knock this crap off. People can use whatever updating tool they're comfortable with. I hope in the not-so-distant future this will be even more true. -sv -- fedora-test-list mailing list [email protected] http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list