Re: Fedora Core 1 Update: gcc-3.3.2-2
Tim Kossack <[email protected]> Thu, 13 Nov 2003 17:32:56 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.redhat.rhl.beta,gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.testers |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Am Mit, den 12.11.2003 schrieb Bill Nottingham um 20:44: > (We're still ironing out the kinks here. Comments on the notification > format welcome.) despite the fact that fedora is primarily aimed at people with some knowledge of linux and therefore ease-of-use isn't very high on the priority-list (is it?), it would nevertheless imo be a good idea to seperate the security-relevant updates from the normal ones, either in the headline (f.e. "fedora security-update") or by including a line under "name" (like "security-relevant" yes/no). this of course just for the final (not "test"-) updates. if so, this would ease the use and burden of administration of fedora on pcs of normal users (family, friends etc.) enormously, because they could (after a short instruction and subscription to fedora-announce-list) install the security-fixes themselves. of course, the next step would be at least an option that up2date would install those security-updates automatically (because there's imo no good reason speaking against it). -- fedora-test-list mailing list [email protected] http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list