Re: xhost not working?
Andy Green <[email protected]> Thu, 13 Nov 2003 17:22:21 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.redhat.rhl.beta,gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.testers |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Thursday 13 November 2003 16:58, Neal D. Becker wrote: > > You should use ssh anyway. > > It's too slow. Running xemacs client on a cygwin machine, which is very I read an interesting thing somewhere recently -- you can apparently separately configure ssh's bulk encryption from the authentication encryption. There's even the option to go for no encryption for the transport (although I guess you should give up on su in that case). The benefit is that you still have strongly encrypted session authentication, but you can trade off encryption strength against performance for the bulk data. - -Andy -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE/s73NjKeDCxMJCTIRAttnAJ9jFCh9YON9wjfVhlVzEsaNwRY7kwCgj9Es H93TfZYn9gtr5pZekOSqXZ0= =O2zs -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- fedora-test-list mailing list [email protected] http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list