RE: what is the appropriate list?
"DanG" <[email protected]> Fri, 14 Nov 2003 20:59:14 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.redhat.rhl.beta,gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.testers |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <20031115015842.NVXT489038.fep01-mail.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com@pittlandctr8at> |
Yes that is the problem and it affects only the original 3c905 cards. I am currently running the system with Kudzu off for runlevels 345 so the card initializes. It's been posted for some time now by myself and others throughout the test cycle. I only wish given all the feedback we have given that by now it would have been resolved. Oh well we will play the wait and see bugzilla game for now :-). -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Iain Rae Sent: Friday, November 14, 2003 8:14 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: what is the appropriate list? William Hooper wrote: >DanG said: > > >>Yes that is true, that is where bugs should be posted. However to defend >>Elton it was for an outstanding bug. I too have an outstanding bug with >>Kudzu and my 3c905 card not initializing at boot time (can you say NO >>Network connectivity!) that has been around since Fedora Test 1 (yes I >>have >>made numerous bug reports to bugzilla :-)). >> >> > >Most likely hard to pin down. My 3c905 (b or c) seems to work fine. > > it seems to be specific to the original 905 (tried 3 all have the same problem), 905b in the same machine works fine. It seems that kudzu triggers it when it probes the card before the module has loaded. >[snip] > > >>Many people have >>workarounds and find fixes that are not posted to bugzilla. >> >> > >"If it's not in bugzilla, it doesn't exist." The point is those >workarounds and fixes should be going in bugzilla. > > > <nods> -- fedora-test-list mailing list [email protected] http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list -- fedora-test-list mailing list [email protected] http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list