RE: what is the appropriate list?

"DanG" <[email protected]> Fri, 14 Nov 2003 20:59:14 -0500
Newsgroups gmane.linux.redhat.rhl.beta,gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.testers
Message-ID <20031115015842.NVXT489038.fep01-mail.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com@pittlandctr8at>
Yes that is the problem and it affects only the original 3c905 cards. I am
currently running the system with Kudzu off for runlevels 345 so the card
initializes. It's been posted for some time now by myself and others
throughout the test cycle. I only wish given all the feedback we have given
that by now it would have been resolved. Oh well we will play the wait and
see bugzilla game for now :-).

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Iain Rae
Sent: Friday, November 14, 2003 8:14 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: what is the appropriate list?

William Hooper wrote:

>DanG  said:
>  
>
>>Yes that is true, that is where bugs should be posted. However to defend
>>Elton it was for an outstanding bug. I too have an outstanding bug with
>>Kudzu and my 3c905 card not initializing at boot time (can you say NO
>>Network connectivity!) that has been around since Fedora Test 1 (yes I
>>have
>>made numerous bug reports to bugzilla :-)).
>>    
>>
>
>Most likely hard to pin down.  My 3c905 (b or c) seems to work fine.
>  
>
it seems to be specific to the original 905 (tried 3 all have the same 
problem), 905b in the same machine works fine. It seems that kudzu 
triggers it when it probes the card before the module has loaded.



>[snip]
>  
>
>>Many people have
>>workarounds and find fixes that are not posted to bugzilla.
>>    
>>
>
>"If it's not in bugzilla, it doesn't exist."  The point is those
>workarounds and fixes should be going in bugzilla.
>
>  
>
<nods>


--
fedora-test-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list



--
fedora-test-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list