Re: Fedora errata and test errata
"Gene C." <[email protected]> Mon, 17 Nov 2003 16:06:45 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.redhat.rhl.beta,gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.testers |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Monday 17 November 2003 15:46, Bill Nottingham wrote: > Gene C. ([email protected]) said: > > OK, I have been running all of the updates and "test updates" currently > > posted with no problems. > > > > However, I do wonder how bugs should be reported. Should they be > > reported against Fedora Core 1 with the specific package version/release > > specified or what? > > Either that or rawhide. I would rather reserve "rawhide" for packages from "development". I seems to me that a new version should be defined in bugzilla (update-testing?). BTW, bugzilla needs some updating for package names: for example, in Fedora Core 1, there is no rpmdb-redhat package; instead the package is rpmdb-fedora but there is no such package defined to bugzilla. I believe I have run across another one but do not remember what it is. -- Gene -- fedora-test-list mailing list [email protected] http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list