Re: Fedora errata and test errata

"Gene C." <[email protected]> Mon, 17 Nov 2003 16:06:45 -0500
Newsgroups gmane.linux.redhat.rhl.beta,gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.testers
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Monday 17 November 2003 15:46, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Gene C. ([email protected]) said:
> > OK, I have been running all of the updates and "test updates" currently
> > posted with no problems.
> >
> > However, I do wonder how bugs should be reported.  Should they be
> > reported against Fedora Core 1 with the specific package version/release
> > specified or what?
>
> Either that or rawhide.

I would rather reserve "rawhide" for packages from "development".  I seems to 
me that a new version should be defined in bugzilla (update-testing?).

BTW, bugzilla needs some updating for package names: for example, in Fedora 
Core 1, there is no rpmdb-redhat package; instead the package is rpmdb-fedora 
but there is no such package defined to bugzilla.  I believe I have run 
across another one but do not remember what it is.
-- 
Gene


--
fedora-test-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list