Re: Proposals for the Updates Testing Procedure
Jakub Jelinek <[email protected]> Thu, 13 Nov 2003 16:35:17 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.redhat.rhl.devel,gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 04:13:33PM -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote: > Warren Togami ([email protected]) said: > > I'd say that 1-2 months would be a fair time limit for update testing. > > 1-2 *months*? I'd say weeks, tops. Especially for security issues, it should IMHO be days, not weeks. It would be good to know how many people actually tested it though, if there are problems, they will likely show up in bugzilla, but if there are no reports, it is unclear if this is because nobody bothered to test or because it works for everybody. I don't think WWW/FTP/rsync statistics would be much useful, because mirrors will be downloading them and people on the other side could download from mirrors, not from d.f.r.c. Jakub -- fedora-devel-list mailing list [email protected] http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list