Re: Some fedora devel inconsistencies...
Jef Spaleta <[email protected]> Thu, 13 Nov 2003 17:38:48 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.redhat.rhl.devel,gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Nicolas Mailhot wrote: (and yes apt can get wild - but if I understand well, yum will block every single time whereas I know from experience apt is right most of the times) 90% okay when 10% wrong can eat 330 packages accidently..can not be considered sanely better than 100% wrong, where wrong means you've stopped anything from happening. Its an issue of failure modes...and the risk those failure modes represent to the running system...not to the frustration level of the user. The most dangerous thing to a running system's health is the administrator. Tools that are 10% or 1% of the time going to flip out and want to uninstall large chunks of the system because it found an error are not being respectful of the fact that the person at the wheel might be drunk with power. -jef"stop drop and roll"spaleta -- fedora-devel-list mailing list [email protected] http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list