Re: Some fedora devel inconsistencies...
Nicolas Mailhot <[email protected]> Fri, 14 Nov 2003 10:29:58 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.redhat.rhl.devel,gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.devel |
|---|---|
| Organization | Adresse personnelle |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
--=-nNbnWWZwRKBFvnbFoK14 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Le ven 14/11/2003 =E0 10:06, Panu Matilainen a =E9crit : > On Fri, 14 Nov 2003, Panu Matilainen wrote: > >=20 > > Actually.. (hear a bell ringing.. looking up source...) you can easily > > enable yum-like safe-mode on apt as well: just specify > > "APT::Get::Remove=3Dfalse" in apt.conf or as command line option and it= 'll > > stop right there if an operation would remove something. >=20 > In fact .. APT::Get::Remove=3Dfalse in apt.conf or --no-remove on command= =20 > line. Yum is worse than this. It will block if an unrelated dep is not satisfied - with --no-remove apt will block only if all the updates require a removal (I think - didn't test it) Cheers, --=20 Nicolas Mailhot --=-nNbnWWZwRKBFvnbFoK14 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e=2E?= -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQA/tKCUI2bVKDsp8g0RAu/RAKDaXGTQYbROnqmRxzsCTnxpOccaOwCg3GxE umB33QK8l6OFiT+jdXvLHOY= =BY9p -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-nNbnWWZwRKBFvnbFoK14-- -- fedora-devel-list mailing list [email protected] http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list